It seems that the rumors are true.
The New York Times just reported a United States defense official confirmed that Osama bin Laden was killed.
The President will be announcing the details tonight.
It seems that the rumors are true.
The New York Times just reported a United States defense official confirmed that Osama bin Laden was killed.
The President will be announcing the details tonight.
Rumors are flying that Osama Bin Laden is dead.
President Obama is or should soon be addresssing the American people.
I hope Bin Laden burns in hell and that the United States put him there.
Given today’s partisan division and rancor, it is good to see that folks can still have a good sense of humor.
Obama delivered some good-natured shots at Donald Trump, Matt Damon, and others during yesterday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner. He also made light of the recent release of his birth certificate.
All very entertaining stuff.
Yesterday I concluded that purchasing a Toyota Corolla was the most economically efficient decision given my circumstances. However, I also suggested that it still might make sense to purchase a Prius under certain conditions. Continue reading
All this outrage in America over a Florida pastor’s burning of the Koran is starting to get a bit ridiculous.
I understand that it is not in the United States’ interests to inflame the Afghan people. This fact explains why General Petraeus had to apologize to them (see video below).
What really angers me, however, is that the reaction to a legitimate (though offensive) act of free speech in America was an indiscrimate attack on United Nations staff. The attack, which was preceded by the burning of an American flag, killed seven innocent people who were helping the very savages that attacked them.
That’s right. I called them savages, because attacking innocent people out of religious zealotry in response to a criticism of their faith is outright barbarism.
Now, instead of vigorously defending the American values of free speech and expression, our government is apologizing to a bunch of terrorists, who ruthlessly and needlessly murdered seven people who were helping them rebuild their country.
These savages should be apologizing to the international community for this act of terrorism, not the other way around.
When someone burns an American flag in this country, it is highly offensive to me. Yet I would willingly die to protect that right. Burning the Koran is equally offensive to many, but the Constitution protects the right of Americans to express themselves by burning it.
The bottom line is that these extremist savages are just looking for an excuse to incite violence. Blaming the admittedly insensitive, but constitutional and non-violent actions of an American pastor for inciting the senseless murder of seven people is outrageous.
America needs to stop apologizing for the actions of these barbarians and start defending its own values.
The United States has a history of swinging from one extreme to another. I think America has reached a point where it has become too apologetic for its values in the same way that it may have been unapologetic seventy years ago. With that, I will leave with two quotes, one from 2009 and the other from 1941:
“Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.”
— General George Casey following Major Nidal Malik Hasan’s murder of 13 people at Fort Hood
“Before we’re through with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in hell.”
— Admiral William Halsey, Jr. following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
I am hopeful that America can find a middle ground between these two extremes.
Last week, President Obama called for the repeal of a $4 billion tax incentive for domestic oil and gas production. His argument is that the oil and gas industry is doing quite well and does not need any help from the government.
In the long-term, the President is right. Oil and gas companies do not need these incentives in perpetuity.
That said, the President could not have chosen a worse time to repeal these incentives. In the short-term, repealing this tax incentive now, when gasoline prices are high, will only push gas prices even higher.
In essence, this action will exacerbate the very problem that the President appears to be using as a wedge issue for his reelection campaign.
Why?
Yesterday, I presented an analysis on the cost to charge an electric vehicle at my home. The goal of that exercise and the one I am about to do now, is to determine whether it makes economic sense for me to purchase a hybrid or an electric vehicle.
Today, I will examine prevailing retail gasoline prices in California and estimate the number of miles I would likely drive this new car each year. Continue reading
Before I post my results later this week, it is important to first outline what key variables will likely drive the decision.
The four most important decision drivers are the marginal cost of electricity, the price per gallon of gasoline in California, each automobiles’ sticker price, and how many miles I intend to drive the car annually.
This post will cover the historical costs of electricity and how one should think about estimating its marginal price. Yestersday’s post, Should I Buy a Hybrid or an Electric Vehicle? (Part I), included the price of each automobile. Tomorrow, I will discuss the considerations around California gasoline prices, and the car’s estimated annual mileage. Continue reading
The video above calmly and dispassionately discusses the “proper” Islamic etiquette for handling an unruly wife.
I wish this were a joke, but it is not.
I want to thank my business school classmate, Dina, for bringing this to my attention. She narrowly escaped the Iranian Revolution as a child.